Sonani v Sonani (36 of 2005) ((36 of 2005)) [2005] MWHC 64 (15 July 2005);

Share



IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI


LILONGWE DISTRICT REGISTRY

CIVIL CASE NO. 36 OF 2005



BETWEEN:

THOKOZANI SONANI…………………………APPLICANT

AND

EDSON SONANI………………………………RESPONDENT


CORAM: CHOMBO, J

Lungu of Counsel for Applicant

Mussa of Counsel for Respondent

Chulu, Court Interpreter


R U L I N G

The applicant and respondent are wife and husband whose marriage is estranged and living separately. Divorce proceedings have been files in the lower court.


The two have two children between then, the subject of this action. The children, until recently were living with heir mother, the applicant. One time she went to work outside Lilongwe and left the children with their nanny. On return she found that the respondent had come and collected the children and is refusing to return them to the applicant. The children are of very tender age.


It is these circumstances that prompted the applicant to commence proceedings under O.29 RSC asking the court to make an interlocutory order restraining the respondent by himself, his servants, agents or otherwise from continuing to keep, detain or interfere with the appellant’s right to custody of the children until the divorce proceedings in the lower court are determined.


Respondent’s counsel pointed out a defect in the applicant’s affidavit. According to the affidavit before me the first name to appear is that of Thokozani Sonani [nee Chimzimu] of P/Bag 26, Lilongwe. The same document however shows the deponent by one MTISUNGE CHITHENGA. When the respondent’s counsel pointed out this anomaly I was of the view that applicants’ counsel, in his response, would clarify the issue. Counsel chose not to resulting in an incurable defect which the court cannot ignore. I must therefore strike out the application because of a defective affidavit.


I order that each party bears its own costs.


MADE in Chambers this 15th day of July, 2005.




E. Chombo

JUDGE