Court name
Industrial Relations Court
Case number
IRC Matter 64 of 2006

Maganga v Raiply Mw Ltd (IRC Matter 64 of 2006) [2008] MWIRC 34 (25 May 2008);

Law report citations
Media neutral citation
[2008] MWIRC 34
Coram
Null





IN
THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF MALAWI




PRINCIPAL
REGISTRY




MATTER
NO. IRC 64 OF 2006




BETWEEN





MAGANGA………………...
……………………………………………. APPLICANT





-and-





RAIPLY
MW LTD……………………………………………………..
RESPONDENT




CORAM: R.
ZIBELU BANDA (Ms); CHAIRPERSON


NAMANDWA
D; Employers’ Panellist


PADAMBO M; Employees’
Panellist


Mwala; of Counsel for
the Applicant


Respondent; Absent
without excuse


Gowa; Official
Interpreter





JUDGMENT


  1. Dismissal-Reason-Misconduct-Neglect
    of Duty-Leaving duty station without permission


  2. Employer bears burden
    of proving reason for dismissal






Facts


The
Applicant was employed
as Production
Supervisor. On the material day he left his duty station to visit a
dispensary (clinic). Later he was invited by
management to be asked
why he had left his duty station. He explained that it was because he
had visited the clinic. He received
a letter of termination. The
letter referred to another incident where the applicant had allegedly
neglected his duties by leaving
his work station without permission.
The applicant challenged the termination. He contended that he was
away from his duty station
for a good reason. He said that as
Production Supervisor he was required to move around the premises for
supervision. He was not
expected to be stationery at one spot.



The
respondent did not attend court to substantiate the alleged case of
neglect of duty. The court proceeded to
hear the matter in the absence of the respondent in accordance with
provisions of section
74 of the Labour Relations Act.



The
burden of showing a reason for dismissal and substantiating it is on
the employer. Where the employer fails to prove the reason
there is a
conclusive presumption that the dismissal was unfair, see section 61
of the Employment Act. And the court so finds.




Finding


The
termination was unfair. The reason for dismissal was not
substantiated with evidence. Applicant is entitled to compensation.

The matter shall be set down on a date to
be fixed to assess compensation.




Any
party aggrieved by this decision is at liberty to appeal to the High
Court in accordance with section 65 of the Labour Relations
Act.








Made
this
26th
day of May 2008 at
BLANTYRE







Rachel
Zibelu Banda


CHAIRPERSON







Daphter
Namandwa


EMPLOYERS’ PANELIST






Maxwell
RM Padambo


EMPLOYEES’ PANELIST